Thursday, December 20, 2007

Ethanol

The Patriot wishes all of his regular and not so regular readers a happy holiday season. I regret that posts have been few and far between lately, but I have been getting acclimated to a new job which leaves little time for bitching and moaning about the state of the union. Yet there is always something to bitch about, isn’t there? Some statistics: Every year, Americans travel some 3 trillion vehicle miles. We consume about 140 billion gallons of gasoline along with 40 billion gallons of diesel. Even the most die hard willfully ignorant among us can’t imagine that the earth has the ability to withstand a rate of oil consumption like that for very long, not to mention the effects on the environment of burning all of that crap. The government’s response to the impending disasters posed by a dwindling fuel supply and global warming was to pass an energy bill that raises the fuel-efficiency standard for new auto fleets to 35 mpg by 2020, a 40 percent increase from today's 25 mpg. To this I have no objection, but the bill also relies much too strongly on ethanol as the fuel of the future. As Salon reports in an article on the energy bill, “Biofuels from most food crops or from newly deforested lands do not provide a significant net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions -- and some may cause a net increase. Most life-cycle analyses show that corn ethanol has little or no net greenhouse gas benefit compared with gasoline because so much energy is consumed to grow and process the corn.” Moreover, even when the United States attempts to solve it’s own energy problem it ends up screwing over someone else. The Economist points out the amazing statistic that "the demands of America's ethanol program alone account for over half the world's unmet need for cereals."

So with all the reasons not to use ethanol, why does the bill mandate that the U.S. increase the use of renewable fuels to 36 billion gallons by 2022, of which 15 billion can be corn-based ethanol? The easy answer is that we got sidetracked on our way to discovering how to efficiently extract from cellulosic sources, such as crop waste and switchgrass. Unfortunately for all the havoc our current biofuel use is having on national and global food prices, ethanol use must, by law, increase to 7.5 billion gallons by 2012, a jump of some 50 percent from current levels.

I am sure there is a hidden nefarious reason why the administration is pushing this. I’ll do a little more digging and report back what I find.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Always follow the money: "who" is ethanol? ADM - Archer Daniels Midland.

When George Bush Sr. ran against Bill Clinton, ADM gave $400,000 to Bush . . . and $600,000 to Clinton ADM hedged their bet, and wisely.

When Ronald Ray-gun ran for re-election, ADM gave him $500,000. Halfway through his 2nd term, a severe drought hit southern CA. Guess who is the largest agri-biz in southern Cali? You got it:ADM.

Ray-gun forced a bill through Congress and over the heads of the Depts. of Interior and Conservation to divert federally protected H2O in northern CA for "agricultural purposes" in the south. The bill broke the back of some of trh strongest conservation law this country ever had.